Christians: if the Tree in the Garden of Eden was not merely of
knowledge, but "knowledge of good and evil"... I refer to my earlier question here:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuPvwX34U88MhXRoJZbDOZTd7BR.?qid=200707 06072223AAgYWM5
Then does this mean that in being naked, the state of which they were first ashamed when they ate the fruit, was the first act of evil?
And does this mean that God created them to do something evil even though they could not know about it? Had they never eaten, would they have continued naked forever, doing something shameful without a concept of shame?
Why couldn't they be ashamed of being disobedient and stay naked? They might as well have been ashamed at their disobedience and so put on just a pair of gloves. There was a specific evil brought to their attention upon eating the fruit. That evil was not disobedience. It was nakedness. They sought to cover their nakedness, not the fact that they had been disobedient.
_
|