Several people thought my idea of planting trees where there is no water where the PEOPLE need water was a silly idea - but here's the thing - if you DON'T do that - in 60-80 - 100 years those areas will still be without water, and the people will still be DYING. But if you bring in food/water - and bring in trees and water the trees - then in 60/80/100 years it will be RAINING there - doesn't anybody get what I'm saying - I can't believe the insulting way people treated my last question

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070707232915AAn8gqe

- they just didn't get it - hopefully this makes sense. Now I know how hard this would be. But the goal is to reforest the planet - and not just the places where that is easy. But if these people really care about global warming then they'll do it. They have money for other things, they'll find money for this too. Some people have lots of money for stuff like this. They just need a PLAN. and proof it works.
I don't think Iraq is about oil - but the government lets people think that because they keep talking about protecting our national interests and they don't tell people what those interests are.
I think Iraq is all about strategic location. You can bet on it.

I thought all along we should have been taking food and water to those people that needed it.
The proof is easy enough to find - Arizona is a great case in point, all it will take is a study of the rainfall over the years and compare now compared to what it was many years ago - I think that will give proof.

Palnting trees is good. You plant as many as you want wherever you want mate.